Posted on Leave a comment

A Conservative History of the American Left by Daniel J. Flynn

Flynn, Daniel J.  A Conservative History of the American Left.  2008, 1st Edition, 456 pages, Dust Jacket, Crown Forum.  Signed by the author.

The title of the book is the classic example of “what you see is what you get”.  This is exactly what Mr. Flynn does with his work.  He’s clearly a conservative, and this is his history of the American left. Mr. Flynn presents snippets of US history.  He starts his work before the Declaration of Independence, with the period around the pilgrims.  He ends it in the post 9/11 world (which he refers to as the “9/12 left”).

He begins his tale by taking us through a series of experiments in the US where individuals set up communities or communes.  In each instance, he points out that the lack of incentive is what led to its failure.

This part takes up a good third of the book. He moves, from there, into the suffragist movement and the anti-slavery movement.  He highlights the conflict and contradictions within the two movements.

He moves into the evolution of socialist and communist parties.  Within this context, he also discusses the evolution of the New Deal under Franklin Roosevelt (to see Franklin Roosevelt items CLICK HERE).  He points out the national security risks created by the left, and that were allowed to be created by the left within the context of these parties within the cold war.

From there, he discusses the anti-war movement, and the various protest/revolutionary groups that popped up at that time, including the Black Panthers and the Weathermen.

He shifts, at this point, to morality, addressing issues such as abortion and the environment.  He used these issues as an overall attack on the left and their use of the courts to do things that cannot, in his opinion, do through legislation.

Finally, he addresses the new left in the post 9/11 climate.  He views that new left as taking on an anti-American stance, justifying actions taken against the US in this context.

So…should you go out and read this book?  He does an excellent job of picking examples of where he feels the left has failed throughout the history of the United States (of course, it’s all a matter of perspective).  He’s very selective in the areas that he looks at.  It appears that he began with a title and then looked for examples to prove his thesis.  Regardless of your ideological leanings, he does present some interesting elements of US history.  If you read it with a discerning idea and remember his bias before you start, it can be an enjoyable read.  If you’re a conservative looking for ammunition to bolster your own arguments, it will be an enjoyable read.  If you’re a supporter of the left, if you’re looking for a positive, in theory, in can provide a guide of what not to do (and, in some instances, what to do).  I would not call this a fair history.  Having said that, as I said in the beginning, the author states his bias right in the title.  This is A Conservative History of the American Left.

To find the book on Amazon CLICK HERE

To find the book on ebay CLICK HERE

To see other books that I’ve got available CLICK HERE

Posted on Leave a comment

‘Tis the Season – Collecting Political Christmas Cards (part 3)

Two weeks ago, I discussed collecting political Christmas cards in general. Last week, I discussed why I love collecting them. This week, I discuss how to organize your collection.  Just a warning…the person who proof read this called me a nerd.

This is how I have mine organized. I separate all of my cards into binders (red for Canadian politicians and blue for US politicians). Each card is placed into it’s own clear PVC free page (with the envelope if I have it, though, the card is in front of the envelope).

I have my Canadian binders organized as follows:

1. Prime Ministers – this includes cards that were sent out before or after their time in the PMs office, ie. I have many of Paul Martin’s Christmas cards, including his time as Minister of Finance. These are sorted in chronological order of their time in office.
2. Political Parties, Provincial Premiers, Governors General, Provincial Lieutenant Governors & Supreme Court Justices – I have these set up with the political parties in the front and then the rest in alphabetical order of the individual of the person regardless of the office, ie. Robert Bourassa (Quebec Premier), John Buchanan (Nova Scotia Premier), Jean Charest (Quebec Premier), Adrienne Clarkson (Canadian Governor General), Bill Davis (Ontario Premier).
3. Non-politicians – This would include embassies, non-governmental agencies, government agencies.
4,5,6. General Political Cards – The rest of the binders are organized in alphabetical order of the politician regardless of the office they hold or where.

My US binders are organized as follows:

1. Presidents – this includes cards from president’s families, ie. Ted Kennedy. It also includes their pre and post presidential cards, ie. Ronald Reagan’s gubernatorial cards.
2. Vice-Presidents, Speakers of the House of Representatives, President Pro-Tem of the Senate & Supreme Court Justices – these are sorted exactly as #2 of my Canadian cards are sorted, ie. Spiro Agnew (Vice-President), Carl Albert (Speaker of the House), Tom Foley (Speaker of the House), Abe Fortas (Supreme Court Justice), Newt Gingrich (Speaker of the House).
3. Political Parties, Cabinet Secretaries – these would be cards that came from anyone that served in a President’s cabinet, including prior elected offices, ie. John Ashcroft’s Senatorial and Gubernatorial cards. They are organized alphabetically instead of by office or the President they served under, ie. ie. Lawrence O’Brien (Postmaster General), Leon Panetta (CIA Director), Robert Patterson (Secretary of War), Dean Rusk (Secretary of State), Fred Scribner (Undersecretary of the Treasury).
4,5,6,7,8. General Political Cards – The rest of the binders are organized in alphabetical order of the politician regardless of the office they hold or where.

As I mentioned last week, it’s always fun to move a card from the latter albums to another album.

How to you have your collection set up? I’d like to know the different ways people have them organized.

To see the Christmas cards that I have available CLICK HERE.

Posted on Leave a comment

‘Tis the Season – Collecting Political Christmas Cards (part 2)

Last week, I discussed collecting political Christmas cards in general. This week, I’m telling you why I love political Christmas cards. Next week, I’ll discuss organizing your collection.

A number of MPs, a number of politicians from every level of government, in both Canada and the US, choose to be original. Their cards have photos of themselves. Their cards have photos of their families. Their cards have photos from their constituencies. Some have caricatures. Some have photos of landmarks within their constituencies. The best ones have multiple pictures.

This is true at so many levels of government. I have cards from municipal politicians with the family photo. I have provincial politicians with family photos. I have state politicians with family photos. I have federal politicians with family photos. One oddity is the Presidential Christmas card. For some reason, the Presidential Christmas card almost never has a picture on it ( 1993 Bill Clinton White House Christmas Card being an exception). I find this odd since, if one looks at their Christmas cards from a previous office, they often do use photos. They become President and, suddenly they select a picture of a painting of Washington or the White House.  I’m hoping someone in the US will be able to explain this to me.  On the plus side, the White House has a web site White House Christmas Cards devoted to them.  Canadian Prime Ministers almost always have photos of themselves, usually with other family members. I have ten Christmas cards from John Diefenbaker and his picture is in all of them.

I find it very interesting to see pictures of politicians in their constituencies, or, “doing their jobs”. “Candid” photos of these politicians within their constituencies gives one a view of the different regions of the country. Family photos of politicians lets you see their kids grow up. My favorite example of the this is Brian Mulroney’s annual card. It’s remarkable watching his kids grow up over his 10 years as leader, including 8 years as Prime Minister. Another great example are the cards from pre-President George H.W. Bush. His cards prior to his presidency included photos of the kids, which includes future President George W. Bush and future Florida Governor Jeb Bush. Seeing these two much younger than today is remarkable. The same can be said of some of Pierre Trudeau’s cards. Seeing the baby Justin, given his position today, is lots of fun (regardless of your political leanings – my non-partisan disclaimer).

Another fun aspect of collecting political Christmas cards is moving them within your collection. For example, Brian Tobin’s cards were in my general Canadian politician collection. However, when he moved back to Newfoundland to become Premier, I moved them to my Premiers collection. The same is true of the John Kerry cards. His cards were in my general US politician collection. When he became Secretary of State, they moved to my US Cabinet Secretaries collection. Sadly (or fortunately, depending upon your perspective-another of my non-partisan disclaimers), my Stephane Dion and Michael Ignatieff cards remain in my general collection, as do my John McCain and Michael Dukakis.

Next week, I talk about organizing your collection (or, more accurately, how I organize my collection).

To see the political Christmas cards that I have available, Click Here.

What are your favourite political Christmas cards and why? You can share photos on the Bill’s Political Shoppe Favourites Photo Album.

Posted on Leave a comment

‘Tis the Season – Collecting Political Christmas Cards (part 1)

There are so many things that people can collect that are of a political nature. The most popular are buttons, posters and signatures. Though I collect everything (sigh), my greatest passion is for the political Christmas card. I have accumulated close to 1000 (I haven’t actually counted, so, this number is rough) Canadian and American political cards. This week I’m going to write about the generic collecting of Christmas cards. Next week, I’ll tell you some of my favourite things about collecting them. Two weeks from now, I’ll discuss organizing your collection.

Every politician sends out Christmas (holiday?) cards.  Some, to more people than others.  Regardless of the office, be it municipal, provincial, state, or federal, it’s an easy way to remain in contact with supporters (many times at tax-payers expense) and keep them engaged until the next election.

Many of the political leaders use a generic photo of their respective legislature or “house of government”. These photos, while nice, tend to blend together when so many choose to use the same photo, even when they’re given a choice. The choices, while there, tend to be limited. As an example I’ll use Canadian Members of Parliament. They are given a selection of Parliament Hill photos to choose from for them to use on their cards. Recently, the selection is from a Canadian photographer Malak Karsh (brother of Yousef Karsh). I will confess that I’m a huge fan of Malak. However, seeing his pictures on so many Christmas cards, year after year, begins to get boring. I still collect them, since the inside is different for every MP.

Until the 1960s, US cabinet secretaries sent out single cards that essentially said, “Merry Christmas and Happy New Year from Secretary… and Mr(s)”. Not even a picture. How boring is that? Fortunately, some of them would at least change the font or print colour every year. If they didn’t, you wouldn’t even know that you have cards from different years. In some cases, the only reason I knew that some US politician’s cards were from different years is that I received them in their original envelopes and could see the different years on the post mark. Talk about boring.

Sometimes, you can get lucky and pick up entire collections.  I’ve been fortunate.  I’ve purchased collections from two congressmen, and I received another collection from an MP who was cleaning out his office and was just going to throw his cards away.  The downside to collections is that, when going through them, you notice the generic photos being used.  Imagine seeing 20 cards with the same picture on the front, all from different politicians.  However, the plus side is having cards with envelopes addressed to the politician.

The political Christmas card has been around for a very long time.  In my own collection, I have one from as far back as 1912, a Lady Grey card (wife of Earl Grey) 1912 Lady Grey & Lady Sybil Grey Christmas Card.  On the US side, I have a Theodore Roosevelt and a hand signed Woodrow Wilson.

Regardless, the one constant is that there are always politicians and there will always be ones seeking re-election (or, working for someone that will be seeking (re) election). This means that there will always be Christmas cards sent out. Unlike election campaigns, they come out every year. Also unlike election campaigns, politicians usually only have one per year vs. multiple buttons, posters etc.

Stay tuned…next week I discuss why I love political Christmas cards, and, in two weeks, I discuss how I organize my collection.

Click here to go directly to Political Christmas Cards

What do you think of political Christmas cards as a collectible?

Posted on Leave a comment

Lessons from John Kennedy

Not that long ago, we remembered the 50th anniversary of the assassination of U.S. President John Kennedy. As a result, there was a great deal said about the man and his legacy. I’d like to add to that by compiling a list of lessons that contemporary politicians can take away from the former President:

1. Think Big – Right in his inaugural address, Kennedy stated that the United States would put a man on the moon and bring him back safely before the decade was complete.  No one, including the President, had any idea of how they would do it…but, he had absolute confidence that the people that he led could do it.  And, they did.  He demanded the impossible of his nation, and they made it happen.

2.  Don’t Back Down From the Forces of Evil – Every leader in a free society faces a form of evil that renounces the very freedoms that we hold dear.  Kennedy was no different.  The Cuban Missile Crises presented him with just such a challenge.  The former Soviet Union decided to place offensive nuclear weapons in Cuba.  Kennedy knew this to be an unacceptable threat to his nation and it’s people.  Without going into the details of the 13 days of the crises (this is a blog and not a book), Kennedy demanded their removal and was prepared to do what was necessary to ensure the safety of the nation he led.  He refused to accept as inevitable the imminent threat that was posed to his nation, and, the missiles were removed.

3.  Face Your Opponents – John Kennedy had many critics for his policies.  Forgotten to time is the fact that his approval rating was not as high as a President seeking re-election in one year would hope.  An example of a piece of legislation that was causing problems for his popularity, at least in a portion of the nation, was the Civil Rights Act (that was finally passed under Lyndon Johnson).  Kennedy could have focused on legislators from northern states, his natural constituency, to ensure it’s passage.  Instead, he chose to demand action from all corners of the country…including Texas.

4.  Take Responsibility – The Bay of Pigs invasion, fiasco, during the first 100 days of his administration could have derailed his entire presidency.  He had an out…the plan was put together during the Eisenhower administration.  He could have blamed “the other guy”.  Instead, he took full responsibility.  He did not shy away from the fact that (using the Harry Truman maxim) “The Buck Stops Here”.  He explained the facts, but took responsibility for the invasion’s failure.

This is, by no means, a comprehensive list.  It does, however, provide another reason that the Kennedy legacy translates forward after 50 years.  Each of these lessons can (and should) be used by every contemporary politician, regardless of party, or ideology.  And, that’s probably why he is still held in such esteem after all this time…his own presidency transcended both party and ideology (a discussion for a future blog).

John Kennedy Items click here

What do you think?  Are there more lessons?  Am I stretching it with the ones that I’ve presented?  Post your comments.

Posted on Leave a comment

The Passion of the Pierre (Trudeau that is)

A little while back I was out at a bar with some friends. As often happens when I’m out with friends (and beer is involved) a political discussion broke out. We happened upon the topic of Pierre Trudeau. One person went on about the evil that was Pierre Trudeau; another spoke of his greatness. The discussion was heated, with me in the middle. Almost 30 years have passed since he’s left office, and, yet, he still invokes great passion and debate (a fact that hasn’t been hurt by the rise of his son to the leadership of The Liberal Party of Canada).

But what provokes the passions on both sides? As I said, from my spot in the middle, he had an agenda and was going to implement it…regardless of what others thought.

Many dislike him because of certain of his economic choices. He was a clear supporter of Keynes (though, in his defense, so was his primary opponent Robert Stanfield). He believed in an activist government; one that played a significant roll in the economy. Policies such as wage and price controls (6 & 5) were anathema to the right, as were the ever increasing deficits. Conversely, many strong supporters of Keynesian policies applauded the expansion of the government, the efforts taken to control inflation and his choices to fight economic downturns with ever increasing spending.

Many individuals dislike his liberalization of social policies in Canada. Without going into the specifics, many of the social policies had already moderated before he brought in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (more on that after). On the other side, there are many more who applaud his expansion of rights (again, before the Charter).

Which brings us to the constitution. In 1982, he brought it home with an enshrined Charter of Rights and Freedoms after numerous attempts. Many who dislike him, cite his preoccupation with the constitution. Setting that argument aside, the debate centers on what it is the Charter has done to Canada. Some believe that it places more power in the courts, taking it out of the hands of the elected people’s representatives. Others suggest that it’s the ultimate protector of the people from their governments.

So, who is right, and who is wrong. In fact (again, from my spot in the middle), both sides are right…and that’s precisely why people still discuss, argue and debate the legacy of Pierre Trudeau.

What are your thoughts? I welcome your comments.

Posted on 2 Comments

Open for Business

I want to begin by welcoming everyone to the first of what will be many blogs.  Unlike the ones coming in the future, this one will be a little about me and my business.

After 12 years in the financial services industry as a full service investment advisor (including 4 as a branch manager), I found myself at cross roads.  I had to decide if I should look for another job in the industry, something I  no longer enjoyed, or would I look to make my living doing something I knew that I would love?  And, could I?

I spoke with some friends, including my old campaign manager, Brendan Mulvihill.  Most really didn’t get what I was talking about, but Brendan did.

He and I got to work and Bill’s Political Shoppe was born.

A little about me and my collecting….

I started collecting political memorabilia 27 years ago when I was 16 years old.  Over the years I have accumulated well over 25,000 pieces in my private collection.  I’ve lectured on the subject at a museum open house.  I’ve put on exhibitions from my collections.  Pieces from my collection were even used in a book, a history on Canadian elections.

In the past, I’ve sold my duplicates at political conventions, antique shows, on ebay and through a printed catalogue that I used to produce.  I will continue to do the others, but, my primary focus will be on Bill’s Political Shoppe.  None of the items available at Bill’s Political Shoppe will be available from me, anywhere else.

A little about my goals with Bill’s Political Shoppe…

I want to establish Bill’s Political Shoppe as a the #1 source for buying a piece of political history, but I also want to put online an illustrated political history of Canada and the U.S.

My blog will focus on a Canadian and/or American political subjects, be it a person, an event, and generally political memorabilia’s use through history. And, they will all be NON-PARTISAN blogs.  I will be inviting you to add your comments.  With that, I am introducing something that I call “Bill’s Six”.  From time to time, a topic will be too big for one blog…I will, therefore, create top 6 lists on the subject.  I will be asking for your suggestions on blog topics, both within, and outside Bill’s Six.  I want to be clear…to keep it non-partisan, I will NOT be speaking about current politicians from either country.  They may receive a mention in a blog, but, they will not be the subject.

I will also be asking you what it is that you’re looking for on the site.

Coming soon to Bill’s Political Shoppe…

Getting launched has, obviously, been my top priority.  However, in the near future, I’m looking to grow Bill’s Political Shoppe, which, I believe, will expand the interest of many more people in Canadian and American political history.

I will be setting up a platform so that other collectors will be able to sell their items.  If my own history is any indication, there’s a good chance I’ll be their best customer.

If you are interested in selling your collection at Bill’s Political Shoppe, please, contact me today!

I hope to talk with everyone soon and I look forward to hearing your feedback.

Thanks,

Bill